Indian Church refuses to endorse political party in election
Assam Christians outraged by Hindu leader’s “divisive” remarks
Moral theologians address challenges in biomedical ethics in India
Persecution of Christians has worsened around the globe, according to new study
Pope to Cardinals-elect: Keep your eyes raised, your hands joined, your feet bare
Tribal Christians avoid travel fearing attack in India’s Manipur
Pope Francis’ visit to Singapore ‘has revived the faith of our people,’ cardinal says
Cardinal Dolan: Harris received ‘bad advice’ to skip Catholic charity dinner
Q: We have many languages in India and a kind of multi-lingual situation. How does that play out with the attempt to impose one language, Hindi, on the nation?
A: “The imposition of a language or the imposition of anything is actually not proper. It could also be considered a kind of violence. Hindi is one of our national languages. Together with English we need Hindi, because we have about fourteen official languages in India across the country. Majority of our people are Hindi speaking, and so we could say the major language of India is Hindi. I think people should be encouraged through all kinds of incentives and encouragements to learn Hindi, but no imposition in any case. I think in a democratic country it’s not valid. No, that is not our national policy; it is the policy of some organization which stands for one language, and one nation, one religion. People can be encouraged by giving different incentives. At the same time, I think imposition of any language is not democratic in the multi-lingual and multi-cultural cultural context of ours. We have cultural pluralism. We should encourage all the languages we have, but both English and Hindi should be there as link languages, and therefore people should be encouraged to learn them.”
Bp Chacko Thottumarickal SVD
Indore
Leave a Comment