Christmas Celebratory Again In Holy Land Amid Ongoing War; Patriarch Urges Pilgrims To Return
Vatican: Former Choir Director, Manager Convicted Of Embezzlement, Abuse Of Office
Christians in Aleppo feel an uneasy calm amid rebel takeover of Syrian city
Kathmandu synodality forum: Indigenous people, ‘not the periphery but at the heart of the Church’
Indian Cardinal opposes anti-conversion law in poll-bound state
12,000 gather as Goa starts exposition of St. Francis Xavier relics
The federation of Asian Bishops conferences has conde-mned China’s imposition of a new security law in Hong Kong, arguing that it “destroys” the city’s autonomy.
Cardinal Bo, Archbishop of Yangon in Myanmar, and president of the Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences, issued a statement on 1 July 2020, condemning the new law and calling for Christians to pray for the people of Hong Kong and China.
The new National Security Law, introduced by the Chinese government on 30 June, introduces new crimes with severe penalties, such as life imprisonment, and allows security personnel from the Chinese mainland to operate in Hong Kong without oversight or restriction from the local government.
Some critics have claimed that the unpreced-ented expansion of central government powers over Hong Kong means that the city’s relative autonomy from the mainland has been effectively abolished. The law’s significant penalties for crimes such as “subversion” has led many Hong Kong residents to see it as an attack on human rights and democracy activists in the city. In his statement, Cardinal Bo attacked the law as “destroying” the region’s “healthy mix of creativity and freedom.” He added that the new law was “offensive to the spirit and letter of the 1997 handover agreement.”
The handover agreement, signed by the governments of the United Kingdom and of China when Hong Kong ceased to be a British possession, guaranteed for “at least 50 years” the city-state’s right to a democratic government and relative political autonomy from the mainland. The UK government has argued that the new security law violates the 1997 agreement, ending the “two systems, one country” model proposed in the document.
Leave a Comment